tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7982880532329247293.post4609071927425654880..comments2008-07-03T21:36:18.222+08:00Wolfbytehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14133583302150503315noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7982880532329247293.post-2988531573911345912008-07-03T21:36:00.000+08:002008-07-03T21:36:00.000+08:00Thanks Kevin. <BR/><BR/>In fact the version running on CodePlex is out of date because I've been using a Crank on my current project. As soon as my project is finished I have an updated version to put together and a whole heap of new features and bug fixes to implement. <BR/><BR/>The most recent re-write of Crank was focused on splitting the parsing, model-building and script generation processes up to support that kind of operation in the future.<BR/><BR/>I'm still messing with the CAL language itself though and until that is nailed down the whole tool is pretty much in flux.<BR/><BR/>Thanks for your interest. It's nice to know I'm not the only who thinks the idea has merit.Wolfbytehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14133583302150503315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7982880532329247293.post-24663475474239885872008-07-03T03:58:00.000+08:002008-07-03T03:58:00.000+08:00Great idea. I havent seen much in the .NET world for this sort of thing. Mostly tools that generate code from a DB.<BR/><BR/>Have you considered the possibility of using templates for the generated SQL? Just thinking about situations where people choose different DB object naming conventions.Kevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18036201604287372480noreply@blogger.com